User talk:KendallandLogan

Welcome!

Hello, KendallandLogan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Auric talk 20:42, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The official Winx Club website has never posted news about new seasons. It never did when the previous seasons were released. Rainbow has always made announcements through Italian newspapers, like the one I have cited.

Rainbow will still make an announcement if the news was false. All companies make announcements if someone publishes false news about them because false news would make them lose a lot of money and companies don't want to lose a lot of money. That's how corporates and companies work. So, the news is still considered to be legitimate so long as you don't have concrete proof that it is false. And, as I've said it before, if there is a source then it must be on the page for all to see.

By the way, the official Winx Club channel, which is linked to the official Winx Club website, has posted a trailer of the new movie. This is enough to prove that there will be a third movie.

You kept on making edits that go against the principles and rules of Wikipedia, you kept on messing up that page using reasoning that goes against logic no matter how many times you were told that you were wrong and you repeatedly kept on removing other users' constructive edits simply because you didn't like them. I'm sorry, but it is entirely your fault if you got caught into that argument and you'll unfortunately have to live up to it.

I really don't mean to be bad or mean, and I don't have anything against you. I would actually be glad if we could be on more friendly terms, but I am only following the rules and editing the Winx Club page to make it more encyclopedic, that is to make it inform people about everything that concerns Winx Club, including its future, like how an encyclopedia should do. DragonFire900 (talk) 19:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are meant for responding to people and so long as you keep on writing on mine I will keep on responding to you. Seriously, are you that stubborn? I don't "get it" because, firstly, the information is an INTERVIEW from Rainbow, and it is illegal to publish false interviews and, secondly, the rules of Wikipedia are written at WP:IRS#News_organizations and WP:CS#Newspaper_articles, and the rules say that newspapers are official sources, so newspapers are official sources. Your argument is completely invalid. DragonFire900 (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tutelary (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at None. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]