User talk:Keted6

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Talk pages

While you did go to one of the Talk pages after your last block, you need to either keep using it as a tool to achieve WP:CONSENSUS, or drop the issue. You cannot just go back to reverting to your preferred version because you think you're right. Also, Obama articles are under probation. You can tell this by the info at the top of the Talk page, right near the FAQ. It looks like this.

Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 12:19, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Your recent editing history at Talk:Barack Obama shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please also see WP:AN3 for the edit warring report against yourself. + Crashdoom ^Talk 12:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days for edit warring, as you did at Talk:Barack Obama/FAQ. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you indefinitely for resuming your disruptive behaviour despite multiple warnings (and blocks) telling you to stop. If you have any questions, feel free to ask here. m.o.p 18:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I demand a template! Keted6 (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to disappoint. m.o.p 18:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]