User talk:Kjasiura

Welcome!

Hello, Kjasiura, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Steve Rao, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC) JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Steve Rao

The article Steve Rao has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for this specific type of article, you may want to check out our criterion for biographies. JohnCD (talk) 22:31, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Rao - notability

Wikipedia's basic inclusion criterion, called Wikipedia:Notability, is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. There is more detail at WP:Notability (people), and a summary at WP:Notability (summary).

The references in the article were all to his own website, except for one piece from his employer, which does not count as independent, and one showing his name in a list of people who won school tennis championships nearly thirty years ago, which is not substantial.

If you wish, I will restore the article into a sub-page in your User space where you can work on it. I do not do that at once, because I do not want you to waste your time. Not knowing more than what was in the article, it seems to me very unlikely that Mr Rao is notable in Wikipedia's sense. That is not at all to his discredit, but only means that he is not a suitable subject for a global encyclopedia. Before you decide, think hard about notability. Piling up a large number of trivial references (a technique known as WP:BOMBARDMENT) does not help. The test is, have people not connected with him thought him important or significant enough to write significant comment about?

You can reply below here; I will watch this talk page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]