User talk:Klow/Archive 2000-2009

"deleting all fan sites" on the Tomb Raider page

Hey, you deleted all the fansites, but Tomb Raider Chronicles is also a fan site, so why did you keep it? One can keep fan sites links if they're relevant, so deleting all of them except one is quite weird. Klow 23:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, fan sites are general not considered encyclopaedic, since they can have a wide variety of bias. Thats the main reason why I deleted all of them. If I missed one, I'm sorry. Disinclination 23:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Tnp-logo.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Tnp-logo.PNG. The copy called Image:Tnp-logo.PNG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 13:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Revisioned_TR_logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Revisioned_TR_logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 21:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing this issue. ~ Bigr Tex 14:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dracula Year Zero

Hey, thanks for contacting me. I redirected Dracula Year Zero to Alex Proyas because the project was only announced. Per notability guidelines for films, a future film should only have an article created when there is notable production underway. Since the film was only announced at this point, it's not certain that it will be produced and thus warrant its own article. I suggest you make a section at Alex Proyas about the film, like what you can see at Neil Marshall. If the film begins production, the film article can be recreated and the content moved to it. I hope that makes sense; this is usually the norm for projects that may stall at any time. Take a look at Spider-Man film series#Future, X-Men film series#Future, and Jurassic Park franchise#Future for examples of where announced film information reside before production begins. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for your answer. I'll have a look at your examples. Klow 17:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Cast-flint.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cast-flint.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hy there

I wanted to ask if you are responsible for laracroft.tv? I'm a big fan of TR games and I wanted to know more things behind the scenes from you. Thank you. --Tudor Tulok 22:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Nope, I'm not responsible of this website, otherwise chronology would have been updated for long. The webmaster is actually the webmaster of Tomb Raider Chronicles.com - you can contact him trough this website. Of course, if you have any questions, maybe I can help. Just ask away! ;-) Klow 00:35, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tnp-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tnp-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Captain Obvious

An article that you have been involved in editing, Captain Obvious, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Obvious (3rd nomination). Thank you. lk (talk) 17:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dylansawiii.PNG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dylansawiii.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:25, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

—LOL ^T/_C 20:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TV star trek TNG moriarty.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TV star trek TNG moriarty.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Montauk Monster"

Please rename your photo of the Montauk Monster. It says Rhode Island. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.4.162.83 (talk) 14:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never chose the name, the pic was already there. I just reuploaded a new version. And I can't rename files, I'm not an admin. But I guess you'll never read this. Klow (talk) 14:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I put this video in the wolk article?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SnO9Jyz82Ps&feature=related

It seems to portray the message accurately.

Rofl. Why do you hide behind an IP? I don't even know why you are so hateful, what did I do, dummy? You could at least have the balls to tell me your problem, and behave like an adult. But perhaps you are not, but if you know Cold Hand Luke, you likely are, so I'm sorry for you if you behave like this. (very useful and very smart to add "<small>" to a comment) Klow (talk) 11:56, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Reddit Mr. Splashy Pants.png

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Reddit Mr. Splashy Pants.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 18:18, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful Christmastime‎

I have no opinion on the name of the Wonderful Christmastime‎ article. BUT... to rename an article you have to move it. By simply copying the the contents from one article to another, you get a result that looks right, but the edit history for the article is lost. That's not good. In the case where an article has moved and you want to move it back you often have to get an admin involved, and I think that's the case here. So... you should contact an admin and ask him to undo what you did, then redo the move using the Move command. — John Cardinal (talk) 17:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Wonderful Christmastime‎" already existed and redirected to "Wonderful Christmas Time‎". Otherwise I would have make a proper redirect, obviously. Klow (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's the point... because it already existed due to a previous move, you have to effectively undo that move. The way you did it, the page history is lost. Seek out an admin who can do it properly. — John Cardinal (talk) 19:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Klow (talk) 22:02, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't taken any action on this as far as I can see. Now there has been an intervening edit, which makes things harder. If you want to get it fixed, I learned there is a page to request help: Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. I'm not going to do it for you. If you can't be bothered, neither can I. — John Cardinal (talk) 03:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]