User talk:Kongu Kaviyarasu Gounder

+++MY Talk Page+++

Kavi Smarthism is our religion and Saiva Siddhanta of Adi Saivas.

enudaiya kongunadu varaipadattathan nee potrukka...appa nan yar? pririjuda? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konguboy (talk • contribs) 10:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page formatting

When you add new information to an existing discussion on a talk page, please add them in the right order--that is, new comments almost always go at the end of the thread you want to add it to. If you just drop new comments in the middle, it's almost impossible to follow the discussion.

thank you ,for your suggestion Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, regarding your refs on Talk:Tamil Kshatriya, I think that maybe the problem is that you just have the wrong article. Your refs do seem to say what you claim, but, more importantly, none of them mention the Tamil Kshatriya. You can't add information about a totally different group/caste/tribe onto the Tamil Kshatriya. It looks like that info should go on a different page, possibly one that needs to be created. Does that make sense? Qwyrxian (talk) 23:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

to Qwyrxian , i am not going to add any content in Tamil Kshatriya article , i am just replying to his(Rajkris) statements in the talk page under his(Rajkris) topic of kongu vellalar . just answering to his question. Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 14:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of PONDHEEPANKAR (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

—SpacemanSpiff 09:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kongu Kaviyarasu Gounder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

who ever has title kongu or gounder , administrator will block him by saying he is socket puppet of pondheepankar, how do he says me as pondheepankar , i can't understand it Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 13:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Comparing your edits with those from Pondheepankar, it's immediately evident that you and he are the same person. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the same POV editing and behavior on all your socks over the past few years. And most recently on your blocked sock User:Knight44 44. —SpacemanSpiff 13:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how do u concluded me as a socket puppet of pondheepankar? because i was editing kongu related topics correct , if u see some one editing kongu related topics you will put them as socket pupput correct Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 14:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

for you only one person in the universe editing kongu related topics or article is pondheepankar correct Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 14:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kongu Kaviyarasu Gounder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am too edited kongu or gounder related article, to administrator who ever edit kongu related article they are pondheepankar Porulur Poosan Kaviyarasu Gounder (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is incomprehensible. Kuru (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.