User talk:LadyDianaFan2000

Welcome!

Hi LadyDianaFan2000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

November 2022

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, LadyDianaFan2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mr. & Mrs. Smith (1941 film) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. S0091 (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, something to belong in the lead it needs to be written about in the article and sourced appropriately and in order for an occupation to be in the lead, it needs to be something for which they were notable, meaning multiple sources have written in-depth about it. 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC) S0091 (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Antoine de Caunes, you may be blocked from editing. Please see the messages above about occupations and verifiability. Larry Hockett (Talk) 12:22, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 14:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i was not attacking anybody, my page wasn't offensive at all, do you think that creating a page about a P!nk porn music video is offensive in your case? i think not. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:03, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and also P!nk has appeared nude so many times, so it would be likely that she would have acted in a porn video. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not claim this without solid secondary reliable sources. —Kusma (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i have the proofs: https://www.google.com/search?newwindow=1&sca_esv=565026230&rlz=1C1AVUA_enIT858IT858&sxsrf=AB5stBh5f-kuWEN-YBjsDxgx8T7_6r_Hkg:1694614516839&q=pink+nude+leak+photos&tbm=isch&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj_lLqC46eBAxWZXvEDHflaAFMQ0pQJegQICRAB&biw=1536&bih=723&dpr=1.25 LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also this https://trahkino.cc/video/69431/ LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

are you convicted now? LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am now convinced that you do not have any reliable sources and that I should block you should you attempt to write about this again. —Kusma (talk) 14:18, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Pink (singer). Schazjmd (talk) 14:19, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, fine. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

and it was not defamatory or controversial. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 14:21, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Calling her a pornographic actress is defamatory. S0091 (talk) 14:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no it's not, she would like it tho. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

she is for nudity and would have loved to act in a porn movie. LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

she is also for masturbation. one of her songs talk about it https://www.iol.co.za/entertainment/celebrity-news/pink-sings-about-masturbation-938459 LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

too many actually LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 15:56, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

U + Ur Hand, Finger, Sober LadyDianaFan2000 (talk) 15:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kusma these responses are very concerning. See the history at Pink (singer) but this and this are examples. S0091 (talk) 16:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: I am aware, but LadyDianaFan2000 has made no mainspace edits since being warned. —Kusma (talk) 16:39, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Schazjmd (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Science Room

Hello LadyDianaFan2000, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Science Room, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Science Room.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]