User talk:Lamazeva

Welcome!

Hello, Lamazeva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Geydar Dzhemal did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

No problem! Lamazeva (talk) 10:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Hello, I'm Berrely. I noticed that you recently removed content from Xwedodah without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 12:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sockpuppeting nor related to any of those users

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lamazeva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Clearly an admin has seen I am unrelated to this alleged "sockmaster" my only other account was "QawmLutMerked" which i used to lurk on my phone, never edit "Qawm Merk is my IRL name, but i deleted the account, and only accidentally even made one edit with it, which i quickly undid once i saw it"Lamazeva (talk) 13:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

While there are currently additional checks that need to be run to confirm the master account, per my notes in the "For the record" section below there is little doubt that you are abusing multiple accounts as confirmed by a checkuser at the relevant SPI. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For the record

Rationalpi111 "Not using this account anymore, I only accidently made it cause I forgot the password to my main account, but now I have my main account back and only using that one" is Confirmed as Swagmaster11139248.
QawmLutGotMerked "Delete this account, i made it cause i forgot the password to my main account" is Confirmed to Lamazeva
Editing from the same city, creating SPIs on the same day, in depth policy knowledge etc. This is definitely abuse of multiple accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well add that his phrase "Qawm Merk is my IRL name" in his unblock request is pretty laughable and dishonest, it's not a real name at all. Qawm (قوم) is Arabic for tribe/ethnicity, with "Qawm Lut" (Tribe of Lot) being a perjorative Islamic term for "homosexual". Merk/Merked is slang for killing someone [1], so his username means "homosexuals got killed". These sort of offensive meme names fit the pattern of AntiRacistSwede's other sock names, such as "OyVey1944", "TheAntiFedora", "SchlomoShekelberg", "BobNVagene" and others. I suspect that if it's not him directly, then it's probably someone from the same community as him, perhaps a shared Discord or Telegram server. I believe that the targeting of those articles will probably resume within another few months by a different sockmaster perhaps, but with the same style of writing and POV-push, we might be dealing with a potential LTA in the making here. Regards. -- Qahramani44 (talk) 03:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All I have to say is that this is an extreme level of paranoia, it's most likely what you and the other two Zoroastrians are doing Lamazeva (talk) 11:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]