User talk:Laure Nbataï

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Laure Nbataï, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Esprit15d 18:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jean-Jacques Birgé, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.drame.org/BirgeBio/zbirgemoyen.html. As a copyright violation, Jean-Jacques Birgé appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jean-Jacques Birgé has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jean-Jacques Birgé and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jean-Jacques Birgé with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jean-Jacques Birgé.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Esprit15d 18:54, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


Authorization has been sent last year. --Laure Nbataï (talk) 23:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Antoine Schmitt[edit]

Calling another editor "unqualified" [1] borders on a breach of WP:CIVIL. This is a polite request to remove or strikethrough the comment. Thanks,--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I did not know I could erase anything on Wikipedia. As I wrote somewhere else : "I would be pleased to discuss with anyone who does discuss and not just threats to delete without giving any explanation. I would be pleased to discuss with anyone who does know even a few things about the matter which should be discussed. You can judge about contributors looking to his or her contributions. Contributions means writing articles, not only bothering anyone in relation with a special project. This sounds really odd." "Unqualified" was not used about the skills to be a censor, but about being aware of the subject which is treated. Sorry if my critic was not clear, but if contributors judge others about what they write, the possible answer about judjing the ones who feel power to threat seemed fair to me. Isn't it right and correct or would you like me to do anything more precisely ? --Laure Nbataï (talk) 04:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

You can edit your own comments on a talkpage the same way you can edit an article. See WP:Dispute resolution for information on resolving specific problems with another editor. Best of luck,--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 15:40, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allumés du Jazz[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Allumés du Jazz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable record label with no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

It is strange that this question appears again after so many years of activity. Les Allumés du Jazz represent 53 French record labels which most of them have their own websites. Deletion might look as pure censorship against French production, because being not as famous as American and multinational record labels. They belong to a long tradition of resistance to a tentative of formating, specially from major labels. What proofs do you need of their existence and actions, except if you don't know anything about the music (jazz, improvised, new music) they defend? Yours,--Laure Nbataï (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The article provides no references for the claims of notability your state. Please add citations from independent and reliable sources in the article or you may need to take your argument to an AfD discussion. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 15:16, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I've added 3 of them among which one of the most famous French magazine abroad (Le monde diplomatique) and the other one published by French Ministère de la Culture. But Googling might have helped you to find these references or others yourself better than threading for deletion. I don't understand these manners by wikipeople who don't know anything about a subject. I hope these references stop your allegations and a taste for censorship that looks more like imperialist manners.--Laure Nbataï (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

By "threading for deletion" an article that provides zero information or sources about its notability brings it to the attention of editors like you to "save" it and establish credibility to the subject. There are no attempts at censorship here, just a call out to those with knowledge on the subject to provide the reliable sources such as you have done. Thank you for participating in this collaborative effort called 'wikipedia'. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allumés du Jazz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GRRR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Laure Nbataï. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Laure Nbataï. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)