User talk:Lazarus89
|
Economic war edits
[edit]You are of course correct on the Anglo-Irish Trade War matter but what about providing some verifiable sources per the citation policy. If you start out doing that for your edits you will make a great editor. Thanks ww2censor (talk) 19:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks man, I will do.... i'm getting to grips with all the mecahnics of editing and so-on and then I will cite my sources Lazarus89 (talk) 01:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding your message.
[edit]First of all, do not state or imply that I am stupid, simply because you disagree with my edits. You failed to cite any sources in your edits to the Michael Collins article, and that is why I reverted your edits. I stand by my reversion. I suggest you assume good faith in future. Thank you. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 02:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I accept and absolutely support citing material, it's the correct way to add to articles but i don't accept I need to cite sources for blatantly obvious and indisputable facts. For example Frongoch internment camp IS\WAS in Wales, who must I cite for that? Equally the Sun IS hot, I don't think I need to cite any sources to support that statement, it's a generally accepted fact Q.E.D Lazarus89 (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Éamon de Valera sources
[edit]I reply where the discussion starts, in this case at my talk page. ww2censor (talk) 02:41, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Ireland naming question
[edit]You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)