User talk:LeeWhittaker

I am an innocent user that has been productively contributing to Wikipedia as a website but have been banned for no reason.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LeeWhittaker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I’m sorry I posted some silly pictures on here a long time ago. Can my ban be lifted so I can edit articles about trains please? LeeWhittaker (talk) 08:14, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm inclined to give you a second chance. It's been over a decade, and as you mention, you were young at the time. Unblocked, welcome back. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:21, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd normally give someone who hasn't edited in 12 years a second chance, but I am concerned about the reason for the block. Is this the only account you have used? (any other admins, feel free to take action without asking or waiting for me) 331dot (talk) 09:48, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was fairly young when I set this profile up. I’ve done some anonymous editing but thought a profile would be better.LeeWhittaker (talk) 20:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I unblocked you, this was not the behavior I was hoping to see. Why did you make that edit? SQL ^{Query me!} 16:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LeeWhittaker, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~~ Alex Noble - talk 21:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 days for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. qedk (t 桜 c) 20:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of James Bowes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]