User talk:Lionx0x

Welcome!

Hello, Lionx0x, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Andkon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andkon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andkon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakhtoneestan empire

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pakhtoneestan empire, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WuhWuzDat 21:24, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for hoaxes, vandalism

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Type your reson here.~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionx0x (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I wrote useless articles. Andkon's information was going to be increased, with references, but I didn't feel I needed to. Pakhtoneestan is fictional, made by me, and Elmwood was done like that because a friend of mine told me that's where he went, so I decided to write it down, but I'm not saying it's his fault. Please, I'm sorry. Can you forgive me? Lionx0x (talk) 03:03, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:36, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I was blocked for writing useless article, vandalism, and providing no references. I know what I have done is wrong, and I believe I am entirely at fault. I will not do it again. I will write articles that are useful, such as articles that people need to research on.~~~~}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionx0x (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for writing useless article, vandalism, and providing no references. I know what I have done is wrong, and I believe I am entirely at fault. I will not do it again. I will write articles that are useful, such as articles that people need to research on. I thought if Iwrote articles about Pakhtoneestan, I could make up a big empire. I didn't mean to vandalize Wikipedia. I like the website. I use it for research.Lionx0x (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on your deleted contributions and on what you have written below, all of which is useless nonsense, I am not convinced that you have the competence required to contribute usefully to Wikipedia. If you wish to convince us otherwise, you may follow the instructions in {{2ndchance}}. Sandstein 20:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lionx0x (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because I wrote useless articles. I am extremely sorry! Andkon is a website and I was going to just write somethings about it and have some references. I believe I know what I've done is wrong and I will not try to do it again. My proposed articles are: Celtic Kings: The Punic Wars because out of all the Celtic Kings games, it's the only one that doesn't have an article. My reference will be: http://www.haemimontgames.com/punicwars/info/features.html and http://www.gamershell.com/pc/celtic_kings_the_punic_wars/review.html. I will also edit Elmwood and say: Elmwood also has some Manitoba Housing townhouses, which lie near Stadacona Avenue and are on Talbot. Lionx0x (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You haven't responded to User:Sandstein's offer to take the {{2ndchance}}. Your article on Pakhtoneestan empire seemed to be a hoax. The material you've added to this page is quite unsuitable for an article. Unless you can make a concrete proposal for something that Wikipedia can use, it would not be smart for Wikipedia to unblock you. Since you've now had three unblock requests declined, I'm disabling your talk page. Any further appeals should be made by email to unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. EdJohnston (talk) 03:36, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I love Wikipedia!

I always enjoyed reading information from Wikipedia, but now, I can write facts about places people didn't know about, like communities, and books! I'm glad I signed up!

A little book!

Here's a book I wrote in elementary:

THE ADVENTURES OF JACK THE ELEPHANT: BOOK 1, THE BULLY

By RP

Jack is Back!

Hey, Jack is back from "The Elephant That Wanted To Grow Tusks"! Now, he has tusks. They're not big, but big enough. Remember Troop? Well, he's in another camp for a few months. Jack is friends now with John, another one of his friend. Life was great. There were new calves (even though males don't have a big relationship with calves), Joe was 55, Jack had tusks, it was all great. He was picking fruit for his son, James, when he heard a sound. He saw an elephant. He went to investigate.

Bobby, The Bully

It was a new elephant. Joe said he was driven away young. Jack knew him mom always told him, "When driven away small, it will grow mean and tall!" She was right. He was mean. INfact, he was a bully. He always acted good in front of Joe.

I Can't Take It!

It was difficult to avoid him. He worked everywhere. Bobby usually worked at the lumber camp. Every chance he got, he would drop a log on another elephant. One day, he went too far. He dropped a log on Jack's son, James. Jack was furious. He would go right up to Bobby and yell "STOP!" He took James back to the shelter and rested.

Revenge!

"Revenge!" whispered Jack as he was nearing Bobby. He jumped at him and yelled. "STOP!" he cried. He was then flipped by Bobby. "Oh, oh! Oh no you didn't! Now you gonna get some of this!" yelled Jack as he got up. He flipped Bobby. Bobby got up though, but to his surprise he had no tusks. His mother saw him. "Mama's comin' baby!" she cried. "I thought you said you had no family." Jack said. "Hehe, well, I forgot my mom. Excuse me, I got to talk to my mom alone." replied Bobby. Bobby and him mother went behind a tree. Jack was listening. "Mommy, that meanie knocked my tusks out of place!" Bobby explained. "THat's good, my little cutie pie! THose tusks were rusty anyways. Now, let Mama make you some apple pie, Granma's Recipe!" Bobby's mother said. Bobby was OK. Jack tried hard not to laugh, but he did. "Ahh, I remember when I used to be embarrassed by my mom...." said Jack as he was remembering the times as a kid....

For the rest of the story, read "The Adventures of Jack the Elephant: Book 2: To The Zoo"!

DROD

Does anybody know about DROD? If you do, then you're awesome.