User talk:Lithamile Socenywa

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry I will never disrupt Wikipedia again please unblock me. I will build Wikipedia better I will never concern myself with other individuals Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 07:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lithamile Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 07:55, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Blindly repeating the instructions you need to follow will not get you unblocked. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 08:03, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lithamile Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions insteaLithamile Socenywa (talk) 08:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't describe the productive contributions you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you're only going to make frivolous unblock requests, your ability to edit this page may be removed. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 08:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I apologise for the disruption that I have caused by blocking people without a reason. And I promise I will never be in contact with Users that disrupt Wikipedia again. I understand that what I did was wrong a unforgettable and unforgivable I am very sorry. I apologise to the administrators a authorities of Wikipedia, again I am very sorry Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 08:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry I will never disrupt Wikipedia again please unblock me. I will build Wikipedia better I will never concern myself with other individuals Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 08:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

I apologise for the disruption that I have caused by blocking people without a reason. And I promise I will never be in contact with Users that disrupt Wikipedia again. I understand that what I did was wrong a unforgettable and unforgivable I am very sorry. I apologise to the administrators a authorities of Wikipedia, again I am very sorryI am very sorry I will never disrupt Wikipedia again please unblock me. I will build Wikipedia better I will never concern myself with other individuals Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 10:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020 (Unblock Request)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lithamile Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for the disruption that I have caused by blocking people without a reason. And I promise I will never be in contact with Users that disrupt Wikipedia again. I understand that what I did was wrong a unforgettable and unforgivable I am very sorry. I apologise to the administrators a authorities of Wikipedia, again I am very sorryI am very sorry I will never disrupt Wikipedia again please unblock me. I will build Wikipedia better I will never concern myself with other individuals

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:54, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lithamile Socenywa (talk) 10:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lithamile Socenywa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologise for the disruption that I have caused by blocking people without a reason. And I promise I will never be in contact with Users that disrupt Wikipedia again. I understand that what I did was wrong a unforgettable and unforgivable I am very sorry. I apologise to the administrators a authorities of Wikipedia, again I am very sorryI am very sorry I will never disrupt Wikipedia again please unblock me. I will build Wikipedia better I will never concern myself with other individuals

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: please do not have more than one unblock request open at once. Also do not put it on hold yourself - only admistrators should do this. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 10:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi - thanks for your kind words(!) The reason for stating that only admins should put unblock requests on hold is not for any reason of power, but purely administrative (hence why we're called admins). If an unblock request is on hold, other admins are less likely to look at it, as they will assume that someone else already is. Also having two unblock requests open at once means more work for us, as it means having to close both of them at the same time. Remember that admins are also human beings, and also volunteers. Thanks. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 07:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CURRO

Hello, Lithamile Socenywa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CURRO, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]