User talk:Locoone2b87ff6
May 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Democracy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Democracy was changed by Locoone2b87ff6 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852981 on 2011-05-23T00:22:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatzchatspy 07:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)- See also IP contributions at same time to the article Democracy. --Ckatzchatspy 07:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Locoone2b87ff6 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise not to ever use this account for unconstructive edits
Accept reason:
Despite the note in the block log, this account is not vandalism-only. There was a single vandalism incident, and while it was deplorable (repeatedly inserting vandalism using a deceptive edit summary with this account and with IPs) I don't see that it merits an indefinite block. I'm unblocking as "time served", since this account has been blocked for more than a month. Just be sure not to cause any more disruption or you might truly face an indefinite block next time. -- Atama頭 21:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)