User talk:LooseWomenFan123

Welcome!

Hi LooseWomenFan123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nick Moyes (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Loose Women (TV programme)

Whilst I appreciate that Loose Women is a TV programme here in Britain, your username might suggest to others that you rather like prostitutes and could, as such, be deemed disruptive by those who don't understand the connection. (It has already been reported by one user, though I have declined a request to block your account. However, if you plan to stick around and contribute, do please say a few words of explanation about your editing interests on your user page to avoid any future confusion. That way, anyone wondering about your motives will be able to discover why you chose that name. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 18:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

When something added to an article is removed, with the reason given being that it was "unsourced" -- i.e., it has no citation from a reliable source so that the information could be verified please do not simply stick it back in without fixing the problems as you did at Katie Piper. That is called edit warring and it can get you blocked from editing. So, do not re-add that information unless it has a citation from a reliable source to support it. Thanks. Eagleash (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, there is a source, so ignore the above. I have added the necessary italics, removed a space before the reference and converted the reference from a 'bare' url. Please see WP:REFB for how to correctly add sources. Eagleash (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LooseWomenFan123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reasons behind me being blocked. However as soon as I was told to reference Morgan's appearances, I did, so it is unfair to be blocked. I am fairly new to editing, so it has took time to understand the rules, so I think a block is quite unfair. Please may you remove my block, as I now understand to reference materials when necessary, and have taught myself how to do this. Thank you, and apologies for my past mistakes, and I will ensure they do not happen again.

Decline reason:

No chance, none at all. You are banned, not just blocked. Stop trolling and leave Wikipedia alone. Yamla (talk) 19:57, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Yamla, I’ve read your description on your page and you sound like a nice person in real life, and I think the way you’ve just spoke to me does not reflect your true personality, as you came across extremely harsh. Anyway, I will take your advice and will leave Wikipedia to the professionals, and apologies once again! Thank you for the feedback and I wish you every success in life.