User talk:Ludokoenders

Estefanía Soto

Your recent editing history at Estefanía Soto shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Ludokoenders. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Estefanía Soto, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update

Points taken. I will adjust the text

Nomination of Estefanía Soto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Estefanía Soto, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estefanía Soto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PROCESS

Please let me know what you want to chnage on the page. The intention is just to create a page for her. I looked at similar model-pages and used my own knowledge (she is an acquaintance) to create the content. I am a fanatic Wikipedia user (reader) but still not very good at absorbing all the rules an regulations that apply creating content. I am happy to discuss suggested improvements to comply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludokoenders (talk • contribs)

Ludokoenders, please go to the deletion discussion page in order to participate. Note that the primary issue here is that other editors have argued that there is insufficient coverage in reliable sources to establish the subject's notability. If adequate sourcing cannot be found, then the article will be deleted. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]