User talk:LunaEatsTuna/Oval Office socket

Oval Office socket received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 26 March 2023 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Oval Office socket has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 16, 2021.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oval Office socket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20171211030149/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html to https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help bae[edit]

when did it get installed 4B5T:N1N:5104:E621:5M93:334C:X1MN:NE32 (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) • Article talk (edit | history) • Watch

Reviewer: ExpertNovice77 (talk · contribs) 10:41, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Copyvio check[edit]

Nothing major to worry about.
Suggest changing "In 1932, the first electrical socket in the White House—NEMA 1-15—was installed during the Hoover Administration to power a lamp, located in the president's bedroom."
- Should be alr now?
  - Yes, that works.

Article[edit]

Per MOS:LEAD the citations will be in the text itself and not the lead.
- Fixed.

"Though the United Kingdom had been installing power plugs and electrical sockets since 1881, the United States did not do so, thus meaning that the White House could not have a socket itself" sounds very awkward.
- Would "However, while the United Kingdom had begun installing power plugs and electrical sockets in 1881, the United States did not; this meant that the White House was unable to have electrical sockets" work?
  - Yep - looks good.

"Hubbell first began to experiment with three-way adaptors in 1906." needs to be cited.
- Fixed.

"On 23 January, the socket to the south-east of the President's desk in the Oval Office was changed to a NEMA 5-15 outlet." any source say why?
- Added.

"it then powered an answering machine." until when?
- Added.

References[edit]

ok

Bibliography[edit]

ok

External links[edit]

FYI, I added a link to commons.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why??[edit]

Why does this article even exist :/ Henrisodgd13 (talk) 17:59, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While, the topic has received wide coverage from many RS sources and even been featured in some books.. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 08:05, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]