User talk:M.brinkers

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

CipherMail[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of CipherMail, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://ciphermail.com/products.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CipherMail[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CipherMail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 19:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm GimliDotNet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. GimliDotNet^{(Speak to me,Stuff I've done)} 19:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons[edit]

Let's get one thing out of the way first. The articles about the "large commercial companies" are just that. About them. Not by them. If you look closely, some of them say things that the companies would never post in a month of Sundays. OK. Now for copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0 for free reuse (including modification) by anyone anywhere. The only restriction is that Wikipedia must be mentioned as a source. Every time you click 'save' here, you are licensing your edit under CC-BY-SA. The company's site says "Copyright 2008-2014..." on it. That means that it can't be used here. Please see WP:COPYVIO for more. Material CAN be licensed, but yours would still not be suitable. We don't use 'we' and 'our' in articles, for a start - that screams 'directory entry!!!', and Wikipedia is not a directory. It's an encyclopaedia. Producing open source software is irrelevant. You could be making ham and mustard sandwiches, selling religious books, or organising a 'help old ladies across roads' day - or running a multi-national corporation noted for sweat shops and shoddy goods. all the same. No promotion - and no attacks. Then there's another problem. Unlike in social media and directories, we have a nasty requirement - notability. Our definition of it, too. Please see WP:CORP for corporate notability (and WP:NSOFT in case you decide to post about the software itself). In either case, there must be reliable independent sources to prove the notability - see WP:RS. (These must also be provided by anyone claiming that working for BloggsCo is the nearest thing going to slavery, and that the socks they make go into holes on the fifth wearing. And similar things. Negative stuff is found in articles, but only if it's referenced properly. And there's nothing the subject of the article can do to remove it. If they do remove it, someone (or a bot) will put it back.) A lot of people misunderstand Wikipedia. They think that because anyone (who isn't blocked or site-banned and who has internet, of course) can edit, they can post anything. They can, but equally, we can remove it if it doesn't fit. Do some Googling, read the policies (including WP:COI about conflict of interest), and have a think. Peridon (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]