User talk:MChinaGA

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

June 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Electromagnetic aircraft launch system, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 07:22, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Chinese 003 aircraft carrier was launched today and also uses EMALS. i have added many references as well. And in some parts, I refer to the internal presentation at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and this part cannot be found on the internet, so I can't add references. But I can assure you that there is nothing wrong with what I have added. MChinaGA (talk) 07:45, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since China will not be using the US system, I've split off all the content not about the US system to a new article, Electromagnetic catapult. I didn't change any of your new material. but am rewriting the lead to reflect the new article' title. BilCat (talk) 08:20, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. MChinaGA (talk) 08:23, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Combating malice

Hey MCGA, thanks for your recent edits of our hidden China content. Could you help to lift blocks on our fellow user accounts, facing baseless accusation? Thanks Inukabear (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ScienceDB moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ScienceDB, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 05:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ScienceDB

Hello, MChinaGA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ScienceDB, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ScienceDB

Hello, MChinaGA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ScienceDB".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]