User talk:MESSOP

Your submission at Articles for creation: Healthwords.ai (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Healthwords.ai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, MESSOP! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Hello MESSOP. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MESSOP. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MESSOP|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:06, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi I am not being directly benefitted to add this page. I am just trying to gain awareness for the site.

Employer: Healthwords.ai MESSOP (talk) 10:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

You are writing about your employer, and that comes under our paid-editing rules, even if you're not expressly paid to edit Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

External links

Please do not add links to your website, they can be considered link spam, and are not in compliance with our policy on external links. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

How do I add a link if it is relevant to the Wikipedia page and adds value to the user? MESSOP (talk) 10:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

The 'External links' section is reserved for link(s) that are directly relevant to the article subject, such as the subject's official website. You may be able to add links to background information etc. in the 'Further reading' section, but be warned, linking to your own company's website will be considered spamming, and is likely to get you blocked. Personally, I wouldn't do it. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Healthwords.ai (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Notcharizard were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Healthwords.ai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 11:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Aoidh (talk) 13:09, 6 August 2024 (UTC)