User talk:Mandaman
A tag has been placed on Shopmanda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Patar knight - chat/contributions 22:52, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of M&A Technology
[edit]A tag has been placed on M&A Technology requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 14:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
{{unblock|Why I am being blocked? M&A Technology is one of the oldest computer companies in Texas. THis article defines what the company is all about. I see articles for many other companies like NewEgg, Tiger Direct, and others. Why are these considered OK but not the article about M&A Technology?}}
Mandaman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The information that I added to the classmate PC is 100% accurate. See the Intel classmatepc.com website for reference to M&A Technology Companion Pc. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth thinks we are a competitor using the intel chip. In fact, Intel launched the classmate pc in the us with three companies including CTL and M&A Technology. They have recently added four more companies. Why do you think this infomation is not relevant to teh article?
Decline reason:
This is not a proper unblock request. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. We have policies on what content we are willing to accept. You've continued to add material after you were told it was not appropriate for our needs. We're the ones who get to decide that, not you. If you want to participate here, you should express your agreement to follow our policies. If you're not familiar with them, see WP:5P. EdJohnston (talk) 03:17, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
(diff) (hist) . . Classmate PC; 09:07 . . (-44) . . Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (Talk | contribs) (→Europe and USA: Website found via Google. This appears to be a competitor using the Intel chip. Link was originally added by user who has been blocked for spamming.)]]