User talk:Mariya Khalavchuk

Welcome!

Hello, Mariya Khalavchuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Saint Rumm, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that your first article was deleted, but we need more women editors, and I sincerely hope you try again. Biography articles are the hardest to create, so you should look for doing something easier to start out with some success. Feel free to contact me if you want help or advice.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Saint Rumm

The article Saint Rumm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable poorly documented person. Promotional article. No credible claim of significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hey. Thanks for your message. I'm sorry, it's my first time writing to Wikipedia. I would gladly correct all the mistakes if you pointed at them. I would just like to tell you that it was not meant to be the promotion article. Im just a fan of Saint Rumm and I wanted to create a Wikipedia page for him. I collected all the proving links I could. Let me know if you can advice me anyhow. Thank you in advance!

Nomination of Saint Rumm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Rumm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saint Rumm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SpinningSpark 22:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]