User talk:Markoveuler

Welcome

Hello, Markoveuler, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Hi Markoveuler! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Kathleen Fisher that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 16:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I will pay attention to the proper usage of the Help:Minor edit label from now on. Markoveuler (talk) 12:16, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yu-Shan Lin has been accepted

Yu-Shan Lin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

–Novem Linguae (talk) 19:08, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Markoveuler (talk) 12:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yu-Shan Lin (chemist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yu-Shan Lin (chemist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Shan Lin (chemist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kj cheetham (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know and for starting this discussion. We are a group of students and faculty at Tufts working on creating and updating Wikipedia pages for underrepresented faculty members in STEM fields. We think Lin may meet one of the Notability criteria for academics for her research contribution and for winning the American Chemical Society OpenEye Outstanding Junior Faculty Award in Computational Chemistry^[1] and the Machine Learning in the Chemical Sciences & Engineering Award from the Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation,^[2] both at the national level and prestigious. Thank you! Markoveuler (talk) 17:04, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Markoveuler, I'd recommend putting your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yu-Shan Lin (chemist) as that is where the discussion will take place. In my experience it's fairly rare for academics to meet WP:NPROF before they are a full professor, and even then it's no guarantee of notability. As an aside, I'd also recommend being careful in terms of WP:COI in general. -Kj cheetham (talk)

Got it. In this case, I will let others comment. I tried staying as neutral as I could and my best at providing citations when writing the pages. Please don't hesitate to let me know if there's anything I can improve. Thank you for your help! Markoveuler (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I thought the article was well written, and I am a great supporter of raising the profile of under-represented people in STEM, but in this particular case it seemed like WP:TOOSOON to me. We'll see what others say though. You might also be interested to look at WikiProjects like WP:WOMENSCI too. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:50, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I haven't read through everything on WP:WOMENSCI but can see that there is a lot of useful information there. Markoveuler (talk) 16:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kj cheetham: I wanted to send you a private message but don't know how to... I want to thank you again for providing a chance to review and discuss this article. By monitoring people's discussion (and keeping googling all the terms everyone used), I learned a lot about Wikipedia editing and in particular WP:NPROF, WP:AfD, and WP:COI. There are some other pages I am working on that I believe will benefit from your and the community's input as well. Anyway, thanks again! Markoveuler (talk) 12:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

Declining this on the basis of it being Malformed... it seems you have copied and paste the article twice. Please fix and resubmit

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Markoveuler/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Markoveuler/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Markoveuler! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 15:03, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rich: Thank you for reviewing the article. Sorry I am quite new to editing Wikipedia and am still learning how to use the Sandbox... I hope the duplication problem is fixed now. Markoveuler (talk) 15:12, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as an aside, the recommended place for AFC article submissions is the Draft: namespace rather than the sandbox. Give me a shout if you'd like me to move it for you, or you're free to move it yourself - there's usually a handy option at the bottom of the yellow box when submitting. Alternatively you can go via the Page menu. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my goodness. Thank you! I just gave it a try and am hoping I did it right...

Looks ok to me! -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Thank you! Markoveuler (talk) 18:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jill Venton has been accepted

Jill Venton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nearlyevil 665 20:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Markoveuler (talk) 20:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne McCoy has been accepted

Anne McCoy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Markoveuler (talk) 05:30, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matthew Shoulders

Hello, Markoveuler. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Matthew Shoulders".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Keith Maddox

Hello, Markoveuler. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keith Maddox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.acscomp.org/awards/the-comp-acs-outstanding-junior-faculty-award. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
^ https://www.dreyfus.org/dreyfus-program-for-machine-learning-in-the-chemical-sciences-engineering-2/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1] ttps://www.acscomp.org/awards/the-comp-acs-outstanding-junior-faculty-award. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[2] ttps://www.dreyfus.org/dreyfus-program-for-machine-learning-in-the-chemical-sciences-engineering-2/. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]