User talk:Marlene Brown

December 2015

Your addition to Children's Museum of Utica, New York has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:59, 6 December 2015 (UTC

Your article

Hello, please don't write autobiographical text and opinion material on Wikipedia. This sort of thing isn't really appropriate for our content policies on writing. If you have issues with the Wikipedia article on the museum, please raise them on the article talk page. All the best. Blythwood (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marlene Brown's History of The Children's Museum of Utica, NY

Hello Marlene Brown,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marlene Brown's History of The Children's Museum of Utica, NY for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Marlene Brown's History of The Children's Museum of Utica, NY

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Blythwood (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 23:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges in relation to information which has been removed from Wikipedia's public records.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org.

Administrators: Information which has been oversighted was considered when this block was placed. Therefore the Oversight team or the Arbitration Committee must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing oversight blocks without permission from an oversighter risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Beeblebrox (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Marlene Brown (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here inadvertently put in material that didn't belong. I first started the Children's Museum webpage on Wikipedia, and am now Executive Director Emeritus

Decline reason:

Per below and per comments you made in the now deleted edit. Your intention seems to be only to edit about yourself and to continue some off-wiki dispute on here. only (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talkpage access revoked

Marlene Brown, I suspect your last edit contained exactly the kind of thing you were told not to reiterate. I have deleted it and revoked your talkpage access. You may yet be unblocked, though, if you show understanding of the need for more discretion, so as not to make the Wikimedia Foundation vulnerable to legal action; it's up to the Oversight admin who originally suppressed your information. I've dropped him a note. Bishonen | talk 22:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]