User talk:MatthewCipolla1

September 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Far-left politics, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 21:52, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at M6 motorway, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dr Greg talk 19:31, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply To Dr Greg[edit]

I wasn’t even finished yet, sir. You didn’t even get me a chance to finish. I was in class. That’s why I didn’t cite my sources. Sorry for the confusion.

Sincerely,

MattheCipolla1 MatthewCipolla1 (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case its better to draft your material either off-line on your own computer, or else in your own Wikipedia sandbox here: User:MatthewCipolla1/sandbox. When you've finished drafting, with references, copy it to the article. The work you have already done is not lost, it is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M6_motorway&oldid=821795191#Accidents -- Dr Greg talk 20:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I notice you are drafting another article in your sandbox (as mentioned in the next section below), but you could create a second sandbox e.g. User:MatthewCipolla1/sandbox2 -- Dr Greg talk 01:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:MatthewCipolla1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:MatthewCipolla1/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MatthewCipolla1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 22:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]