User talk:Maxordan
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(email address removed)
Decline reason:
This account is blocked as a spam/advertising-only account. No rationale for unblock provided. Declined. Also, if you remove anything from this page while this block is in effect, your ability to edit your talk page will be revoked as well. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Promise made, promise kept. Your talk page access is now revoked. If you want to be unblocked, you must file an appeal through Wikipedia:Unblock Ticket Request System. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was new user first time i did not Read Guide and rules Before Editing the Article and user Talk Please unblock next time i will do carefully ;Maxordan 07:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This doesn't address the reason for your block, nor explain what steps you will take in the future to avoid problems. In addition to the other issues noted in your block log, I notice that you'd resorted to outright vandalism shortly before your block was placed. If you want to be unblocked, we will need you to address the following questions:
- What edits do you intend to make if you are unblocked?
- Why do you believe your actions were viewed as disruptive before?
- What commitments are you willing to make to ensure that your editing does not become disruptive again?
Any other specific information that you think would be helpful in reviewing your block should also be included, but please don't post any personal information including contact information. Hersfold non-admin(t/a/c) 15:54, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please stop removing declined unblock requests from your talk page, these must stay on your talk page while ever you are blocked. If you continue to breach the reqirements listed at WP:BLANKING your ability to edit this talk page may be removed.
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i was a new user when i was create article about my self and i was did'nt read guide and rules before creating the article its very shame for me. i promise that next time i will read wiki's rule before creating or editing and any article, i appreciate you after unblock my editing option
Decline reason:
You were asked 3 simple questions above. This unblock request does not answer them, thus it has been declined. Next unconstructive unblock request might result in your right to edit this page being revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 23:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You were told not to remove declined unblock requests. If you do it again, your talk page access will be revoked. Favonian (talk) 16:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- It would appear from this edit that you preferred to ignore several warnings and a previous revocation of talk page access, so it's gone again. You know the drill. Favonian (talk) 17:44, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
is closing. Restoring TPA for plausible unblock request to be posted. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason for blocking because I was repeatedly removed warnings from admin on the user talk page, I also promoted myself and after three warnings I was blocked, from today I also understand that I am not allowed to write about myself, or Will I not promote any other subject. My aim is to write only about confirmed and famous people to get more information and I would like to only work on that.;Maxordan 14:36, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Wikipedia has pretty specific rules about inclusion. They are based on coverage in reliable sources, not being "confirmed and famous". Although that sounds quite similar at first, the concept of fame is quite ambiguous. Many, many people assert that they are famous, and they probably are – in their own mind. I'm not convinced that you've read our rules and understand them. Also, what is your relationship with User:Meisamkhosravi? This person is on the same IP range as you and has declared a conflict of interest with you, which is kind of weird for a random person to say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Maxordan 16
- 48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear admin, I completely understand the situation now, you are afraid that I might make the same mistake again. "confirmed and famous" I actually mean the news media coverage [1] sources, the ones that have published most of the news and articles I'll verify first and then publish more about them, and the User:Meisamkhosravi he is my manager where I am currently working in his office. I can also provide proof if needed, yes we were creating the new article and later deleted it because we don't have reliable sources to validate it.If you check history of my account you will see how old it is, it means I really love to write articles and I like the name Maxordan, i hope it is clear, and i will be allowed to move forward in this career.;Maxordan 16:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm having trouble understand what you mean by "the ones that have published most of the news and articles I'll verify first and then publish more about them." That doesn't convey a clear understanding of how our policies work. I checked this history of your account, and I see very little there to convince me that you have a sufficient understanding of how to contribute construcitvely to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Maxordan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- What did you do? ::I created multiple accounts on Wikipedia, notably Koraskadi and VeryGoodBoy. I used these two accounts to prevent spillover of toxic edit wars to multiple articles. However, I understand that I had abused these accounts in same articles either by mistake or with intent to influence content without due effort. I admit I had abused these two accounts on COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea with an explicit intent to influence content. I created another account, Res Iusdicata, for editing the article Chosun Ilbo and other related articles involving Korean politics. *Why can we be sure it won't happen again? ::I will again create separate accounts, but for broader topics that do not overlap as Koraskadi and VeryGoodBoy did. For example, I will create an account that covers history, culture and language, a second account for South Korean politics, and a third account for scientific theories. I will use the current account, Judication as the first account that covers history, culture and language. If possible, I will inform an admin or admins of the creation of these accounts by email so that Wikipedia administration knows these accounts belong to me. This will prevent myself from even thinking of abusing these accounts, and Wikipedia administration can immediately intervene if I abuse these accounts. It's my wish to keep these accounts separate to prevent what I have already experienced, which are spillovers of edit warring to multiple articles in Wikipedia, and online harassment, invasion of privacy, and real world threats through other platforms and means. *What would you like to do when unblocked? In addition to describing the general direction, please also provide at least two specific examples for helpful edits that you would like to make but are currently prevented by the block. Which article, which change? :During my absence, I believe a lot of inaccurate and distorted content have been introduced to articles where I used to be active, notably Goguryeo, Balhae, Gojoseon, Hanbok and articles and contents related to them, and these changes have made them inaccurate, biased and unencyclopedic. I can provide specific examples for helpful edits to improve Wikipedia in each of these articles. If these edits are disputed, I will actively engage in discussions and dispute resolution procedures as I've done here[1], here[2] and here[3] in the past. Specific examples are provided below outside of the unblock request template due to an error that I can't figure out how to solve. Judication (talk) 13:06, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Voice of Clam 20:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.