User talk:Mbranscombe
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia Davies.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rcsprinter (constabulary) @ 16:39, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia Davies.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 15:51, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Julia Davies
[edit]- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! StarryGrandma (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
My comments are here, since I don't know how to leave them in the review:
An encyclopedia article about a person needs to avoid being a list of things that she is known for. Since you have to show that a person is notable to get the article accepted, this is easy to forget. That said, a person's own papers and presentations don't make them notable as far as an encyclopedia is concerned.
Leave out things that sound like advertising because they are opinions. "Dr. Davies has had a varied and successful teaching career to date." is an opinion. Calling something a "prestigious online literacy platform for academics" is also an opinion unless you have a reference that says it is. "Sharing knowledge" sounds like a heading in a press release rather than an encyclopedia article.
Not every professor is a notable person. Write the article to show what makes her stand out from the usual professor with a lot of papers? She is co-director of The Centre for the Study of Literacies. (Leave out the @Sheffield, its informal and not part of the name). The centre opened in 2009. Was she part of developing it? She is co-editor of Literacy, a peer-reviewed journal. The journal is a publication of the UK Literacy Association. Is she is active in that organization in other ways? What about in the other organizations. What is her main area of research? It looks like "advocate for broadening the definition of literacy to incorporate the use of digital technologies in literacy education in England", but that is buried in a long run-on sentence. Make a section for her research. Remove the lists of publications and reviews. List just the book and a few key articles as needed to reference her work. We need to know about her research and its impact; its a very interesting area. She's been a keynote speaker at conferences; describe the conferences, don't just mention them. We don't need to know about international travel. We need to know the meaning of what she has done. Good luck. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia Davies, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:37, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Julia Davies
[edit]
Hello Mbranscombe. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Julia Davies.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Julia Davies}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 13:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)