User talk:Megajeffzilla

Welcome!

Hello, Megajeffzilla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Chillum 02:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the passage...

It is precisely about Brietbart's News Network, the Huff, and Drudge. Read it, please. Atsme☯^Consult 23:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's about his work on HuffPo and Drudge. Brietbart.com is not mentioned anywhere in the piece.Megajeffzilla (talk) 23:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The 3RR...

You appear to be a new user, and it is rather surprising that you would jump right in and start reverting edits for no valid reason. You might want to read WP:3RR. If you keep reverting, you may be blocked from editing. Atsme☯^Consult 23:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to be less patronising, and also read the talk page for the page in question where I started a discussion. One which you ignored.Megajeffzilla (talk) 23:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not being patronizing. You obviously didn't read my edit. What I wrote actually talks about the websites. Breitbart did create the Breitbart News Network, and he was an evolutionary pioneer of the other two - can't get away from that - but the statement in my edit is about how the websites spurred advances in the Web medium. I consult you to undo your 3rd revert. Atsme☯^Consult 01:01, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't try to threaten me. Megajeffzilla (talk) 01:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not threatening you. I'm advising you about the 3RR because you made 3 reverts and you did so with no basis. Atsme☯^Consult 02:09, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=5jRFD5Mzx9sHZLT_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_ebAdRpFrZtl7N6B&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback at Mark Meechan

Hello. I have recently rolled back your edits [1] to Mark Meechan, as they contained improperly executed references, unsolicited changes, and possibly WP:UNDUE content. Note that if you wish to include material on an article consensus must be established on the articles talk page before inclusion.--SamHolt6 (talk) 23:04, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would be very intrigued to learn what you mean by "unsolicited changes" as this is not how Wikipedia works. Megajeffzilla (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]