User talk:Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Krj373. An edit that you recently made to Wild boar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!<! Template:uw-test1 --> Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 17:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. Much more practice I need.

That is weird place, sandbox. It say: THIS IS SPARTA for 100 times. Are you sure that is practice?

I cannot make Principal dancer as link, it is one there that stops me. Anybody want to talk here?

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC

That's good you talk about it. It's down there you mean. Yes. Also above, there are things there too. Why people not talk to me? Nobody talks. I am learning English, want to talk to people how to make page, how to learn. Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 23:07, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, never in articles. No signing articles. Talk page only. Can you tell me who will help me get a nice page like Thomas has? Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 23:14, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Now I am clicking on help and they say / Wikipedia:New contributors' help page/Sorry, we don't do that. They don't help?Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 23:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hi. I'm Eman235 and I'd like to thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia.

Here's some links you might find useful:

Introduction and Getting started
The five pillars of Wikipedia
The Manual of Style (simplified version)
A cheatsheet of Wikimarkup
A glossary of Wikipedia jargon
Where to ask questions: the Teahouse is a good place for this, as is the Help desk; for a factual Q&A forum, see the Reference desk. Other pages can be found here.
Writing an article? See Your first article and Article development. Requested articles lists many pages in need of creation.

Things everyone should know:

Always sign your posts with four tildes — ~~~~
Remember to keep your cool
Never violate copyrights
And always assume good faith (because not every unconstructive edit is vandalism).

When it boils down to it, editing Wikipedia is a fairly simple thing to do; you're encouraged to be bold when updating pages. Anyway, Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich, good luck! Eman235/talk 00:25, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Very nice! Now I will read and learn. I like it, many information. This was from teahouse, very good, put here: Help:Editing. Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 00:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. Your recent edit to the page Ludwig Wittgenstein appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 03:33, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, no! No factual errors! It is a well known fact. Not incorrect. Not false at all. The Vienna Circle were the circle of philosophers who introduced logical empiricism in Western philosophy. The base was exactly Tractatus. Read logical empiricism. It is a very well known fact. Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC) This is from article:"In this theory of knowledge, only statements verifiable either logically or empirically would be cognitively meaningful. Efforts to convert philosophy to this new scientific philosophy were intended to prevent confusion rooted in unclear language and unverifiable claims.[1] The Berlin Circle and the Vienna Circle propounded logical positivism starting in the late 1920s." You must read about it and you notice it's true, because it is true. This is one very important thing. Exactly WHY Wittgenstein is so important in philosophy. Not piano or brothers suicide, but the develop of logical empirism. The scientific mind! Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here, read very careful . This is very important things, very very complicated, OK: https://philosophynow.org/issues/103/WittgensteinTolstoy_and_the_Folly_of_Logical_Positivism http://www.westga.edu/~rlane/analytic/lecture10_witt1.pdf http://www.thatmarcusfamily.org/philosophy/Course_Websites/Language_F11/Notes/13-14-Logical_Empiricism.pdf https://philosophynow.org/issues/103/WittgensteinTolstoy_and_the_Folly_of_Logical_Positivism

Michael Sergius Alexander Ferdinand Fedorovich (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]