User talk:Michaeltsantini

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Michaeltsantini/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Michaeltsantini, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm Mlpearc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Venus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Michaeltsantini/sandbox

Progressive Creationism

I previously reverted your edit to Progressive creationism and you have now reverted my edit. Your edit in turn has been reverted to the original state of the article. Please do not (as I suggested in the edit summary when I reverted your edit) revert again without taking your reasons to the talk page, which is the proper place to discuss contested changes to an article. Edit summaries and posting your own email address are not acceptable places for ongoing discussions for changes to Wikipedia articles. If you revert again you will be getting close to 3RR and disruptive editing practices. Thanks Robynthehode (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Michaeltsantini. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 15:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Women's march edits

Hi, I saw you made some edits at the 2017 Women's March, including: "Nonetheless, the large group was not represent of the entire gender, as the pro-life women's movement was not invited to participate." I reverted your edits. You may notice other sections further down in the article in which your thoughts might be expressed, including a section on the participation of several pro-life groups. Thanks for your contributions.Bjhillis (talk) 20:19, 24 January 2017 (UTC)