User talk:Mike Eckman

March 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kodak Ektra ‎ have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 02:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I don't understand why my contributions are being removed for self promotion. I updated the article for the Kodak Ektra, with my own photo of a Kodak Ektra and included a link to an article I wrote about it in the External Links. This isn't to self promote, it's to add relevant information about an obscure camera. Someone named Velella removed everything I added.

Mike Eckman (talk) 02:32, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By all means re-add the photo if it is relevant (which it seems to be) but do not link to any unreliable web-site. Unreliable in this instance includes any blogs, social media, your own web-site or anything similar. So, I am afreaid you can't use material that you wrote to support any article on Wikipedia unless it is published on a reliable web-site such as "The Times", "The BBC", "Amateur Photographer" or a commercially published referenced work such as the "British Journa; of Photography" or even better "The British Journal Photographic Almanac" from the mid 1940s. Hope that this helps. Regards Velella ^{Velella Talk} 02:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Mike Eckman, I have added back the photo per the above agreement. The link to your own web site is a no-no on Wikipedia, as it can also be construed as personal promotion, in addition to the reasons provided by Velella.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks guys!

Mike Eckman, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Mike Eckman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hubert Nerwin[edit]

Hello, Mike Eckman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hubert Nerwin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hubert Nerwin[edit]

Hello, Mike Eckman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hubert Nerwin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:19, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]