User talk:Mike Kitchen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Student Loan Hero (January 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Mike Kitchen, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Student Loan Hero (May 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 03:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Student Loan Hero (June 7)[edit]

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Student Loan Hero|cv=no|reason=v|details=|comment=I looked at the references added recently. Three of them are easy to reject as not contributing to WP:NCORP. The CNBC, USA Today, and MarketWatch pieces are all first-party, i.e. an employee of Student Loan Hero writing about their own company and having it printed in another publication. The piece on lendedu.com is a little harder to evaluate. I've read their editorial integrity statement and I'm convinced they meet our requirements of a [[WP:RS|reliable, independent, secondary source]. But, they're also a niche source; they specialize in the narrow educational lending space, so them writing about an education lending startup doesn't say much about notability.|sig=yes}}