User talk:MiraSchuetz

This is MiraSchuetz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nomadicghumakkad,

thank you for your comment. I added the first author publication of Dr. Nicolas H. Thomä with the highest number of citations to the education section. Please note, that the last position in an author list shows the corresponding author, in terms of being responsible for the project. The list of references shows only a selection (relevant for the content in the wikipedia article) of his outstanding contribution to the field of his reserach. I have cited 13 publications of Dr. Nicolas H. Thomä (12 as corresponding author) including 7 publications in Nature, 2 in Science and 1 in Cell. Nature, Science and Cell are the most important journals in the field of Biochemistry (among others). I will also add a link to his full publication list.

Please let me know, if there is anything else you think is missing.

Best regards,

Mira Schuetz MiraSchuetz (talk) 09:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

to meet enWP standards:

1. remove minor and student awards. 2. list his 5 or 6 most cited papers, with number of citations

3. don't make general claims for the work of his laboratory unless there are publications to refer to. What an employee of his did is not Tomas, accomplishment, but the emeployeee's.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MiraSchuetz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines nor WP:NPROF. Everything listed here is a primary source or written by the subject.

All of the sources here are primary sources affiliated with the subject.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Nicolas H. Thomä. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Nicolas H. Thomä specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Nicolas H. Thomä; television and radio features ABOUT Nicolas H. Thomä.

Frankly, if the subject isn’t passing WP:NPROF they may not be eligible for an encyclopedic article.

Also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources are.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Nicolas H. Thomäto have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas H. Thomä and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 04:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas H. Thomä has been accepted

Nicolas H. Thomä, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:41, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]