User talk:Mlayu
July 2022[edit]
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indonesian language without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 23:36, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- @MrOllie: The article Indonesian language are full of inappropriate content redirects and forced POV directed to Malay language, while in fact Indonesian is not Malay, if you don't want me to change it then that's okay, but I hope you are willing to help fix it. I don't know what kind of category suit these kind of behavior but the article of Indonesian language is heavily vandalized Wikipedia:Content forking. (Mlayu (talk) 23:40, 8 July 2022 (UTC))
- The sources that you have been removing seem to disagree. We don't just ignore or delete sourced content on Wikipedia. If you want to drastically rewrite the article in this fashion you will need to form a consensus of other editors on the article's talk page. MrOllie (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- When I said it's heavily vandalized, I really mean it, you have to open the sources one by one and it says diffetent thing, for example in the sources says nothing about Malay, yet it's written as 'Malay' in article. I'm not trying to "drastically rewrite", I just want to fix what it was supposed to be fixed, you can even see on each sub sections of the article are pushed to redirected over Malay-related articles, meanwhile this is about Indonesian language not Malay. Can I redirect all about English language into the German language? This is different language, don't messed up things! Did you understand what I'm trying to say? (Mlayu (talk) 02:49, 9 July 2022 (UTC))
- The sources that you have been removing seem to disagree. We don't just ignore or delete sourced content on Wikipedia. If you want to drastically rewrite the article in this fashion you will need to form a consensus of other editors on the article's talk page. MrOllie (talk) 23:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Dispute resolution[edit]
Hi Mlayu, you may be looking for the information displayed on the page WP:Dispute resolution, which contains a lot of helpful advice. As you're not dealing with a vandal (i.e. not with someone who intentionally damages the encyclopedia), I have declined your report at WP:AIV for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Hello, thank you for your attention, I appreciate your work. But somehow I feel offended by User:Azuru79's words, because he did personal attack on me: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1097196375 and I guess it clearly violates the WP:NOPA. (Mlayu (talk) 08:12, 9 July 2022 (UTC))
- No worries. Yes, you are correct, and I have already warned the user for doing so. Please focus on the content/facts even when replying to such attacks, to force the other editor to stick to the facts as well. I'm sorry to see that you had to experience this, but let's move on from there. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:14, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eiskrahablo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eiskrahablo. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 12:48, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.