User talk:Moamoa17

Discussion utilisateur:Moamoa17 (sur Wikipedia en français) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 6PO (talk • contribs) 19:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Moamoa17. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Brianga (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brianga,

Many Thanks for all those valuable inputs and advice, which I read carefully.

I already took the step of disclosing my employer before making my draft proposal for a contribution on a Thomson brand article.

note : there was so far no published WP article on Thomson brand in English language.

there is only one WP article on Thomson brand published in French language.

I would like to learn , with your help, how I could possibly submit to the English WP community such a contribution, in the most appropriate manner, which would not -- in any way -- violate or be contrary whatsoever to -- WP content policies.

looking forward to your guidance in this respect.

thanks in advance

Best regards

Moamoa17 (talk) 17:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft of Thomson brand

Hello Brianga and Moamoa17,
the draft is here.
--6PO (talk) 18:47, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Brianga and 6PO and Kikuyu3,
Do you have any comments to make to this draft of article in English on Thomson brand ?
.Please see its contents here.
--Your inputs would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards
--Moamoa17

Hello Brianga and 6PO and Kikuyu3,

My Best Wishes for the New Year! especially good health and a lot of success in all your projects.

I did not receive -to my knowledge- any comments so far to this draft of article in English on Thomson brand.

Please see its contents here.

Your inputs would be greatly appreciated.

if no comment, could this article be now published?

Best Regards

(talk) 17:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

moa17|Moamoa17]]:::Hello Brianga and 6PO and kikuyu3,

I did not receive any comments to this draft of article in English on Thomson brand.

Please see its contents here.

Since I received no feedback, how could I get this article in English to be published on WP?

Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards

--Moamoa17 (talk) 13:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 6PO and kikuyu3, and Brianga

Following the comments I received from MassiveVR--6PO (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC) to my draft of article in English on Thomson brand (V2).[reply]

I made several changes, especially regarding the references, for which I searched for reliable citations in english language.

Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards

Moamoa17 (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Moamoa17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moxy (talk) 16:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomson (brand) (2) (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

All the red text around the references, it almost hurts my eyes. The references use bad parameters like Titre, what does that even mean?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomson (brand) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 13:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Moamoa17, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 13:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomson (brand) (2) (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Simply not satisfying to our simplest policies. Please see WP:YFA, Referencing for beginners third-party sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomson (brand) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MassiveYR ♠ 09:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomson (brand) (2) (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tobyc75 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Parts of this could be merged into Technicolor SA. No references establish the notability of Thomson as separate from Technicolor SA and many of the references just mention the name without any in-depth coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomson (brand) (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tobyc75 (talk) 20:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]