User talk:Moorstreet

Welcome

Hello Moorstreet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up!

Graham87 14:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But please be aware of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which discourages the expression of opinions in Wikipedia. I think you went a bit too far at Victorian gold rush and History of Victoria, and I've edited those pages accordingly. Graham87 15:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The main article about Victorian Aborigines

The text that you added to John Batman is both shocking and fascinating, but could you consider moving/copying some of it to Victorian Aborigines, which seems to need a lot of tender loving care? In particular, some of the text that you added to Batman's article does not directly relate to him, as the events noted in it occurred after his death. Graham87 15:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What you are now adding

To Victoria is a clear case of WP:UNDUE - it should be in the Victorian Aborigines article (and summarised with a see also indicator in Victoria, and expanded in the sub article) - not in the upper part of the general article about Victoria - take care - as suddenly jumping in with your enthusiasm to state a case/issue is not what wikipedia WP:ABOUT - you should listen carefully to others, and also be very careful at looking where things already are - take care Satu Suro 11:28, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Melbourne appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. I appreciate what you are trying to do but Wikipedia must hold to a neutral point of view and editors must avoid using Wikipedia to promote their personal point of view. Mattinbgn (talk) 10:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hello, I would second the comments above; but if you can manage an article on Eumeralla wars (which did happen) that would be useful, Old Melbourne Memories has one slant; damned if I know where the Hentys went north from Portland before 1838 (and, if they did, there were no aborigines, due to the thick bushland); they did go for a ride east in November 1834 though nothing untoward noted in the diaries. Regards Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moorstreet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moorstreet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]