User talk:Movingon55283

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nathan Anthony Carter, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mr. R00t ^Talk 22:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nathan Anthony Carter, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 22:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nathan Anthony Carter, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Mr. R00t ^Talk 22:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nathan Anthony Carter, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 22:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Eagle One Media has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Also, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Movingon55283. You have new messages at Bobby122's talk page.
Message added 02:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Anthony Carter

A tag has been placed on Nathan Anthony Carter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Citations

I see that you have been having trouble citing. Please go to this link Citing sources. It should help you out. Happy editing, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 05:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Remember to use four tildes

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Bobby122, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 06:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Movingon55283. You have new messages at Bobby122's talk page.
Message added 06:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Conflict of Interest

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 07:11, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Nathan Anthony Carter

I have been looking at the history of Nathan Anthony Carter which has been deleted three times, and which you have created again. In particular I have looked at the posts you have made to justify keeping the article. You have written "I do not think this page should be deleted, because I have worked hard to get here." I have every sympathy with you: it must be frustrating to put so much work in and see it all deleted. However, Wikipedia's inclusion criteria are based on the notability of the subject of the article, not the diligence or industriousness of the writers of articles. Another thing you have written to justify keeping the article is "As of now, he is popular in hometown, Chico, CA." That may well be true, but it is not enough to establish notability by Wikipedia's standards. Then we have "He is a member of the group who officially started the first annual Chico Independent Film Festival." Notability is not inherited: even if the group is notable, that does not make every member of the group notable. Wikipedia is notable, but that does not mean that every Wikipedia editor is notable.

In the latest version of the article you have written that Carter is "still largely an unknown", which is very close to being to saying that he is not notable.

Looking at the present version of the article, two of the three "references" do not even mention Nathan Anthony Carter, and the third falls well short of the standard required to establish notability.

The article does not make any serious claim of significance at all. However, rather than just delete it, I have spent some time making my own searches. I have found mentions of Carter in numerous unreliable sources, where anyone can post, such as myspace, flikr, vimeo, starnow, and Wikipedia, but I have found no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Consequently I have concluded that the subject does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria, and must be deleted. I understand, as I have already said, that this will be frustrating for you, but you have to accept that Wikipedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's standards or be deleted.

I came here as a result of a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. I do not view your edits as vandalism, which is why I have spent considerable time firstly checking the situation and then explaining my reasons, rather than just blocking you from editing. I also see you have taken a significant amount of trouble to discuss with another editor to get advice on how to improve the article. However, you must accept that Nathan Anthony Carter does not satisfy Wikipedia's inclusion criteria, and therefore any effort spent in trying to improve the article will be wasted effort, as the article will have to go. You are, of course, very welcome to contribute elsewhere in Wikipedia, but if you re-create this article yet again you probably will be blocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)