User talk:Mr. Monobrow

Cheers for the Oasis citations--Crestville 18:09, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at the Mark Coyle page. You might know more about him than me, coz right now, it's shit--Crestville 01:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! BTW, dunt hurt to talk. Who loves ya baby?--Crestville 01:41, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

tell you, you'll be lucky to find any info on the elusive cunt. I only know stuff off the definitley maybe dvd. He's great though, yeah.

Yeah, there's not that much info on him out there, but I reckon I could get enough to do a pretty good article. Starting from him doing the live sound for the Happy Mondays, The Stone Roses and the Inspiral Carpets, throught ot meeting Noel and writing dance music together, through to his work on early Oasis demos, gigs and rehearsals, through to his work on Definitely Maybe, through to his work on numerous Oasis tracks since then and finishing off with his Tailgunner stuff. There's more info out there than you think. A list of his individual contributions to Oasis tracks and gig would be immense, let me tell you. Mr. Monobrow 01:58, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be better at finding stuff that me (and I suspect you might be the proprieter of the Mr Monobrow Oasis fan site), so could you please do me a massive favour and have a go at finding and uploading the swirling union jack plughole image from thier first demo with The Real People. I need if for the info box on the Live Demonstration page. I know there's one on the Mr Monobrow site but me computer won't let me acess it (virus' and that), so could you please give it a crack? Cheers mate, big fun. --Crestville 02:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zak Starkey case

Bring the Reactor interview as citation fact, dude. Otherwise I will be forced to take some sort of stinky telling to the webmasters of your behaviour. Bring it on, otherwise I will continue to reverse it. I need a citation of the Reactor interview and that's it. I don't take kind words for granted. I need facts and I need them quickly.

I hope, I'm clear Elan Morin Tedronai 15:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what he's talking about, I rarely do, but both of you would catch more flys with honey than vinigar. Stop being snotty, your doing no one any favours. He needs to stop being agressive too, but I've told him that before.--Crestville 17:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the relevant part of the Reactor interview. http://www.mrmonobrow.dsl.pipex.com/monobrow/unheard/files/reactorzak.mp3

Now, there's nothing in there, or in the articles quoting the Toronto Sun interview, which suggests Starkey has been offered a permanent/full-time role in Oasis. Like I said, you can't be a full-time member of two bands - let's say Oasis wanted to go back in the studio whilst Starkey is still on tour with The Who. Now, they'd either have to get another drummer in or wait until Starkey had finished his other job. There's plenty of articles online with headlines saying Starkey had been offered a full-time role, but there were all quoting the Toronto Sun interview, and if you read the quotes carefully, it's just Noel saying Starkey can continue with the same role as he is in now, which is recording the Oasis album and touring it, and then going off to do the same with The Who. "If he wants to." The Reactor interview, where Noel says: "I don't think he's ever going to leave The Who" and "I wouldn't ever wanna put him on the spot and say, 'If you join Oasis, you've got to leave The Who'" makes that position very clear. Also, you have the interviewer saying to Noel, "You introduced him as an official member this week", to which Noel said, "No."

One persons slack journalism can spread like wildfire over the Internet, such as the numerous articles declaring that Noel was going to team up with the Chemical Brothers again, when all Noel had said was he'd like to work with them again. Whenever possible, I steer clear of stories printed on half-reputable website when quoting sources, because of those very reasons. I prefer to read or listen to the full interview or the full quote in context instead of some journalists interpretation.

I'd also like to comment on my so-called 'behaviour' which I think was perfectly acceptable. I was just commenting on something I said twice which was removed by someone who, it seems, hasn't even heard the interview in question. I thought the fact that I quoted a good part on Noel's comments would have been good enough evidence. I wasn't rude, there was no insults, it wasn't aggressive - it was maybe written in a firm-sh tone, but nothing more than that. Mr. Monobrow 20:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Monobrow, I wouldn't take anything painbearer/elan says worth much. I received similar threats from him after I did some heavy clean up on the radiohead article which I assume, based on his comments at least, that he wrote a great deal of. The interesting thing to me about this is that in his articles, he doesn't seem to quote much of anything at all. Johnsorc 21:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unkind of you to say it. I hadn't wrote great deal of Radiohead. It's a collaborative work. Step back.

As I said behaviour, I meant reverse of the text, which I considered right. Anyways, I appologize and I'm not right, and you have my respect Monobrow... that I can't say for mr Johnsorc. Elan Morin Tedronai 10:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, another one, I will write that Zak has been offered part-time membership in Oasis. And I think that this is what is happening, Zak Starkey is part-time member of Oasis and part time in the Who. After all, Noel said that he doesn't need to work for Marr, as they are all friends. Elan Morin Tedronai 10:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Live Demonstration

I've already got quite a bit of info about this in my article on The Real People, but now there's a separate page on it I was thinking about moving it over to Crestville's Live Demonstration page. I would be very grateful lf you could check it for accuracy for me. Jud 21:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no!

Greatest hits? Fuck that!--Crestville 09:36, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Tonight

You're absolutely correct about Talk Tonight being written for a girl in San Francisco. I am that girl! I wrote a letter to MOJO that was published in the August 2005 issue that was somewhat a rebuttal to the Oasis issue that came out a few months prior. I still have the guitar that Noel wrote Talk Tonight with that he wanted me to give him. I've read some inaccurate information regarding the inspiration of this song, i.e.: a woman vacationing in Las Vegas who thinks it's about her. Listen, I'm not trying to "cash in", in any way. I'm just a fiend for accuracy. I've made some corrections recently to the Talk Tonight page. Let me know what you think, or make any improvements. Thanks!

Seems alright. I suppose you'd know better than anyone :) --Mr. Monobrow 21:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ftm-tape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-tape.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Uk dont look back lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Uk dont look back lg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bhnteaser.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bhnteaser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Slideawaypromo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Slideawaypromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:25, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Masterplan (song)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Masterplan (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 19:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, I wasn't the one who tagged it, but I thought that you should be told. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 19:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:OasisRockandRollStarcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:OasisRockandRollStarcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Songbird sleeve.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Songbird sleeve.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RKID35TPX.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RKID35TPX.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RKID35TPX.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RKID35TPX.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ftm-doublecd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-doublecd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ftm-dvd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-dvd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ftm-minidisc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-minidisc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ftm-vhs.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-vhs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ftm-vinyl.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-vinyl.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oasisbigbrother.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Oasisbigbrother.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:265c 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:265c 3.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ftm-highcd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-highcd.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ftm-cassette.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ftm-cassette.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Only Fools And Horses DVD cuts

I have nominated List of Only Fools And Horses DVD cuts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Only Fools And Horses DVD cuts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. magnius (talk) 16:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Live Demonstration

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Live Demonstration. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Demonstration. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Oasis-stoptheclocks.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oasis-stoptheclocks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Live Demonstration (Oasis) tracklist.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Live Demonstration (Oasis) tracklist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Livedemonstration.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Livedemonstration.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]