User talk:Mragoplay123

This is Mragoplay123's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monro (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChunky was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mragoplay123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 06:43, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Monro

Hello, Mragoplay123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Monro has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Monro. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monro (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to fail WP:NOTINHERITED, as the sourcing only relates to other people he is associated with.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:04, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Devonian,

References 2, 3, 4 and 5 are all articles directly associated with the subject, not based around people he's associated with. Reference 3 talks about his contributions towards Sinead Harnett's songs too - is that a viable way to incorporate his production work for that artist?

Reference 7 I can update with a direct article from the foundation.

For reference 8, the section on Monro is made up of around 20% of the word count in this article, does that not count as more than a 'passing mention'? Reference 18 is made up of a similar percentage of article wording too.

On a side note - this guy has obviously contributed a lot to other peoples careers and it's detailed in verified places like Spotify crediting, Genius, articles etc. The makeup of it all is that he's well known and accomplished, but sometimes it's not as clear cut in terms of a full scale article about him anywhere. I'd love for him to get his flowers - how do I showcase his credentials in a way that can be accepted?

Sorry I'm new to this and figuring it out, appreciate your help and patience in advance. Mragoplay123 (talk) 13:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]