User talk:Mrlewis93
October 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Plank, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:06, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plank with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. SKATER T a l k 23:07, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Plank with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:09, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 23:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Mrlewis93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don not see the work I did as nonconstructive. Plank is a term often used in this context and has been published in many books with this meaning. I was merely trying to inform the rest of the world as to the alternate meaning of this phrase. I fail to see how this is vandalism.
Decline reason:
Super. Maybe Urban Dictionary may be more receptive of your efforts. Kuru (talk) 01:25, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.