User talk:Mrmastodon32690

Concerning Cradle of filth's HW2 cover

Hey man. Thanks for your contribs to the Cradle of Filth page. You're wrong about Hallowe'en 2 though - it's a cover of Samhain, not the Misfits. Whether the Misfits covered it later is irrelevent - it was announced by Cradle as a Samhain cover. Have a look on their website. But the Konami thing is good stuff! Cheers, Cardinal Wurzel 20:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal told me how it is a Samhain cover.

I put it as a misfits cover.

It is a Samhain cover, but the song is legally a Misfits owned song since the Misfits rerecorded it and bought the rights. The song shows up on Collection 2

Sorry for the confusion, i did try and fix the mess.

Are you sure that's right? That's not the way those things usually work. I mean, just because Cradle covered No Time to Cry doesn't mean that they bought the rights from the Sisters of Mercy and now legally own it, for example. But then again, I think Michael Jackson owns all the Beatles publishing rights doesn't he? So it could be that kind of situation. Did a quick google but couldn't find anything. Anyway, doesn't matter. If you're interested, the relevent bit is in the second Thornography studio report on cradleoffilth.com: "Our first mission was to finish our version of Samhain's "Hallowe'en II" for the forthcoming 'Underworld 2' soundtrack, a song that originally was to feature original vocalist Glenn Danzig way back on the Nymphetamine session..." Cheers again - have a good weekend. Cardinal Wurzel 21:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, i just double checked. if you go on itunes and look up collection two or halloween II itll say it's by the misfits.

gayright?

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Blackheart3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackheart3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blackheart4.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Blackheart4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Daftpunk samples.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Daftpunk samples.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thrillerparty.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrillerparty.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Thrillerparty.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Thrillerparty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. - AWeenieMan (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thriller (band)

The article Thriller (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely fails WP:BAND.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JaGa^talk 23:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]