User talk:Ms03659

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by IVORK was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ms03659/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ms03659/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— IVORK _Talk 23:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Ms03659! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — IVORK Talk 23:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Confirmation bias

@Ms03659: Greetings! I have noticed that you are very proficient in writing, and where to do it (drafts). I have reverted your edits on Confirmation bias (see this diff) because there were many issues. Some of the citations were primary when secondary ones should be used (see WP:SECONDARY). There were some problems with the manual of style because some citations were placed inside the sentence instead of outside of it next to the punctuation marks. Keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, and I believe some "preventive" info existed scattered throughout the article but in an encyclopedic manner. Also, one must seek consensus before adding sections to an article, especially if it is featured because it has been discussed thoroughly prior to promotion, and adding info might paradoxically diminish its quality. It is important to make sure one knows Wikipedia guidelines because I'm sure your loss of work is frustrating, and I can relate to that feeling. Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 09:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Ms03659/sandbox

Hello, Ms03659. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Ms03659/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Ms03659/sandbox

Hello, Ms03659. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)