User talk:Mshonle~enwiki

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: you can sign your name with ~~~~

snoyes 07:00, 20 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks! Interesting site you have there yourself. MShonle 10:53, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Cantor set

You were mistaken to write 0.0999999... where 0.02222222... appeared in Cantor set. You neglected the fact that this was being done in base 3, and that it is important that that base is used. Michael Hardy 00:33, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Good catch. Thanks. I'll make the revert. MShonle 00:47, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Gmail

Well, I do try to keep an NPOV... but yeah, it rocks. I'm going to add a section on its limitations soon, though, such as how it doesn't display picture attachments inline like Outlook or Mozilla, and, of course, how there's no wap or pop access yet. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 12:59, Jun 15, 2004 (UTC)

Reversions

I revert edits which I do not consider to be improvements to articles. Both the Zionism and Anti-Zionism articles represent a great deal of work by many editors, including me, and have achieved a state of balance which was acceptable to editors holding different points of view. I am therefore very reluctant to allow that balance to be upset by edits which do not take the total context of the article into account. Anti-Zionism has a long section on Palestinian and other Arab attitudes to Zionism, and also a section on the influence that the Israel-Palestine conflict has had on attitudes to Zionism in other parts of the world. The opening sections are intended to be a general introduction to the topic. Inserting statements taken out of their proper context in the introduction only serves to re-open arguments about the balance of the article. Adam 04:16, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

But the opening should give an introduction to the overall article, particularly a long section. You've just proved my point. MShonle 04:53, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I will try to recast the opening section to take that into account. Adam 05:39, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'm happy we seem to have found some consensus in the intro, even though I'm not exactly sharing your views. Please see my latest entry at the talk page. IMO examples don't belong in the intro, especially controversial ones. You don't want the readers' blood pressure rise before they finish the entire article :) ←Humus sapiens←Talk 05:25, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Right, if we wanted temperatures to rise we need only direct them to Jayjg's edit commentary. MShonle 05:47, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Sorry for my joke about annoying billboards

Hehehe, that was me that changed this sentence by adding annoying, it was not a serious edit of course. "A billboard or hoarding is a large outdoor annoying signboard, ..." Sorry for that *blush*. I wanted to show a girlfriend of mine that you cud change something straight of, but she wasn't impressed unfortunately. And I had to do this because I'm a member of the Wikipedia Anonymous Funny Vandalists (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bad_jokes_and_other_deleted_nonsense/Funny_vandalism , you'll find two excellent examples there of much funnier funny vandalism). Of course we Wikipedia Anonymous Funny Vandalists consider ourselves hooked to funny vandalism and we call our sponsor if we feel the urge to commit funny vandalism, but my sponsor wasn't home unfortunately. hehehehe no I wanted to show my new female flat mate how wikipedia worked and couldn't resist the temptation of finding out how much time it took to get goofiness removed. (I would have removed it myself if no one else had.) It took 37 minutes before you removed it by the way so this proves again wikipedia.org is great. Silly edits are removed very fast. Sorry for the inconvenience *blush* I will try to control my funny vandalism urge next time. This was my first funny edit by the way after hundreds of serious edits. If you wanna know who I am check out my personal page. CYA Mshonle!!!!!!!!!111111111111oneoneoneone Paulus/laudaka (add me to your YIM/AIM/ICQ/M$N M contact list if you like!) Laudaka's talk page 09:05, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing

If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

GFDL is why we are here and why it's been working. Keep my contributions only in GFDL. MShonle 06:00, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Computer security audit

Thanks for your help. I learned the computer trade by doing before getting the big picture education. I don't have much in the way of academic credentials. I have learned most of what I know about computing by applying what I have learned at vendor schools (classes offered by the computer hardware and application producers) and peer discussion groups, then exploring how come this or that program not doing as I intended. I feel like I still am a Wiki newbie, and probably will be for a few months. AlMac 23:14, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly an incremental process. If you have the time you might want to change all the [[Links like this]] into [[links like this]], so the first letter would be just like it is normally in the sentence. Since the MediaWiki syntax doesn't rely on CamelCase we can make the text look more natural (and keep it capitalized, e.g., if it starts a sentence). Also, once you've linked to an article you don't need to link to it again. That can cut down on the color changes and make the text more readable. MShonle 00:02, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

macros in C

Actually, the do ... while (0) trick is necessary. Consider the macro:

#define FOO(x, y) { func1(x); func2(y); }

This code would then yield a syntax error:

if (x)
   FOO(x, y);
else
   bar();

Whereas this works fine with the do ... while (0) trick (because the macro definition itself does not include a terminating semi-colon -- the macro use site supplies it).

Neilc 02:42, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! MShonle 04:01, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Sapient (company)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sapient (company), by 71.239.128.88 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sapient (company) is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sapient (company), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mshonle! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 69 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Bill Griswold - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mshonle. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mshonle~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:39, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]