User talk:Mustafa Bevi
Welcome!
Hello, Mustafa Bevi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Tone 21:51, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Hannibal Article Shortening[edit]
Hey, just wanted to thank you for your nice work in shortening the Hannibal article thus far. But there are a few issues that I want to raise with you, firstly, a heap of information is being deleted as opposed to reworded. Sometimes this is necessary, but in other times the information just needs to be linked to Hannibal and details of the Roman Senate need to be shortened. When this information is deleted however, are you making sure it gets moved to articles, because the information is generally quite good and deserves to stay on Wikipedia. Lastly I would hope that you wait a few days for proper consensus before going on with your shortening. See Talk:Hannibal. Nobleeagle (Talk) 08:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Joe Swindells[edit]
Since you prodded it in March, I thought you'd like to know that Joe Swindells is now at AfD. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:39, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Charlie McCarthy (socialist), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Thunderwing 18:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Cupids (club)[edit]
I have nominated Cupids (club), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cupids (club). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ┌Joshii┐└chat┘ 18:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Scottish Socialist Party United Left for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Socialist Party United Left (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.