User talk:Mustardwilleywandererscc

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mustardwilleywandererscc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 09:50, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ed Hall (television presenter)‎

The article Ed Hall (television presenter)‎ has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 22:20, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cassius (Robot) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Cassius (Robot), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassius (Robot) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lord Pistachio ^talk 14:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Willey, Shropshire

The article Willey, Shropshire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A look on google maps shows it is nothing more than a collection of farm buildings, more small hamlet at best and not a notable settlement. Also unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mustardwilleywandererscc. You have new messages at Lord Pistachio's talk page.
Message added 16:49, 3 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prizac

The article Prizac has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not sure this place exists. There is a commune named Priziac in the same department.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Markussep ^Talk 07:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This place is a small hamlet not far from Pleucaduec Mustardwilleywandererscc (talk) 10:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It exists as I have been there Mustardwilleywandererscc (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Luke Leahy, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telfordbuck (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was updating stats, what is incorrect in that? Mustardwilleywandererscc (talk) 10:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Leahy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You must update the timestamp otherwise your edit is incorrect Telfordbuck (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you have against updating stats!!!! Mustardwilleywandererscc (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have clearly stated that unless you update the timestamp to reflect the date you made the changes, the statistics appear incorrect. Telfordbuck (talk) 22:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Telfordbuck (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Get off your high horse, at the time of the edit soccerbase had not even been updated,all seems very petty when a simple modification will do Mustardwilleywandererscc (talk) 22:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]