User talk:Myakubu123456

Welcome!

Hi Myakubu123456! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Bacterial growth

I've once again reverted your edit at Bacterial growth, for two reasons:

The article is about the phenomenon of bacterial growth; i.e. how bacteria grow and replicate. It is not an article about the effects of bacterial infections, which is the topic of the content you have added.
Your addition states it should be noted that 158 rapid growths of bacteria in the bloodstream causes an exaggerated and destructive intravascular inflammatory response... which implies that the specific number (158) of bacterial growths is required to cause the described effect, but the source you cited did not state that. (The "158" in your cited source is a footnote number that has been copied to the ScienceDirect website, not intended to be part of the text.)

Your edit was reverted after you added it. Per Wikipedia collobration policies, your next step should have been to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. I urge you to do so now if you still feel the content is relevant. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have chosen not to discuss this matter, I have opened the discussion for you. Please join at Talk:Bacterial growth. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Magnetoplasmadynamic thruster ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, how do I rectify this please? Myakubu123456 (talk) 14:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Additionally, a cursory view of your edits suggests that you're adding citations that do not support the content they're supposed to. Could you explain what's going on? Thank you, 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 17:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Myakubu123456, please take the time to respond to the concerns at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_addition_of_irrelevant_sources. You can still do so while you're blocked from editing articles. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No response to above notices, nor at ANI

Instead, the disruptive edits continue:

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:CC3A (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing articles directly for the next 2 weeks to prevent you from further disruptively ignoring community concerns about verifiability issues voiced on this page here, and at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Persistent_addition_of_irrelevant_sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Myakubu123456 (talk) 11:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #65037

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 20:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So after coming off a two-week article-namespace block for adding very badly sourced text (and text sourced to mirrors), the very next thing you do is the exact same thing that led to your block. For this reason you have been blocked indefinitely. You are not welcome here. Graham87 20:27, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]