User talk:N-g-Efrat
Wessex page
Please use the discussion page before editing the Wessex Inst. page, the issues you are trying to add have been discussed before and it was agreed among editors that it was highly inappropriate. --Curuxz (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Wessex inst page.
[edit]You have added this against consensus twice today, do not do again without discussion and gaining concensus else you risk breaking rules. --Curuxz (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Please do not start up this nonsense again, its not what wikipedia is for and the page has been peaceful and encyclopedic for months now. There is no reason for you to start up this business of trying to turn the wessex page into a personal grievance board again, you have been banned before for it so you know it only ends in conflict. Please use your time on wiki for more constructive uses and let this page stand in its impartial form. Regards --Curuxz (talk) 08:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Sock puppet
[edit]You are invited to contribute to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/N-g-Efrat. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- And be advised, if it is not abundantly plain to you already, that I suspect that User:Zolferkatter is your sockpuppet, and is being used to circumvent WP:3RR. Use of sockpuppets to evade 3RR is an infraction likely to lead to a community ban for you & the sockpuppet. You and the sockpuppet have been invited to discuss the matter on Talk:Wessex Institute of Technology but by your inaction have declined to do so. I invite you to do so once again, but advise that I will pursue community sanctions if you do not. You may wish to read the text at User talk:Zolferkatter ... you are fighting an unwinnable war, which seems perverse to me, but YMMV. This is the only formal warning you will receive from me. --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Blocked for edit warring at Wessex Institute of Technology
[edit]
Edit warring and apparent abuse of multiple accounts, per a report at WP:AN/3RR. EdJohnston (talk) 03:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
WIT and sockpuppets
[edit]I see that your sockpuppet has been identified as posting from the same IP address as you.
You have been invited a number of times, and I renew the invitation now, to discuss your proposed change on WIT's talk page. I hope you'll take up that invitation. I'm equally happy to discuss the matter here or on my talk page.
But you must also be aware, and if not let me make you aware now, that we will not tolerate unilateral actions which go against community consenses; and that if such unilateral actions are taken, they will be reverted and if necessary further action will be taken within the scope of Wikipedia's disciplinary codes. I very much hope that we can avoid such actions. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
February 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Wessex Institute of Technology, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please be advised that if you add the uncited material to WIT once more, you will be barred from the site. I see we have a User:Aziz-Ajga seeking to add the same material. I remember that you in the past used a sockpuppet. I presume you are once again doing so. Sadly, it will not work - there are more honest people watching the article than there are you & your sockpuppets - and it will merely get you all banned. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)