User talk:NIVINCo

Image Tagging Image:11236.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:11236.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk: Whonext360[edit]

Ah, that makes sense. Cool, thanks for letting me know. —Caesura ^(t) 23:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ToonamiJetstreamLogopng.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ToonamiJetstreamLogopng.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Monster Allergy. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 16:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOT[edit]

Read the page I directed you to. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, which is what that list is. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I should actually explain further. As time goes on, that list will just get longer and longer until it dominates the whole of the article with a ridiculous list of things it no longer offers and information that any semi-active person could check with the click of a mouse. Wikipedia isn't a guide of any kind, and it serves no purpose to list every single video the site offers when anyone can easily check it themselves. We generalize to make it easy to read. You don't seem to understand this. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Read point 3 of the section taht links takes you to. Also let me quote it: "Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed." What part of that isn't clear? – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to get it. You do not decide who edits where. If you revert that page again, you'll break WP:3RR. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new page with the list makes no diffference. It's still an indiscriminate list. – Someguy0830 (T | C)

I was trying to show you why the list was inappropriate. I didn't expect you to simply ignore what I was telling you and create a page with the list. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it's not. It's a list. People already know what shows are playing. They can check for themselves. 06:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Those lists contain information that pertains to broader subjects. Your list is a simple listing of videos, more than half of which no longer exist, for a single website. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AuntariSilverMonkey.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AuntariSilverMonkey.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Protection Program[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Princess Protection Program, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Princess Protection Program. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 21:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Protection Program[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Princess Protection Program, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Princess Protection Program[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Princess Protection Program, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Protection Program. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of High School Musical Hits Remixed[edit]

I have nominated High School Musical Hits Remixed, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High School Musical Hits Remixed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. iMatthew (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hannah Montana Hits Remixed[edit]

I have nominated Hannah Montana Hits Remixed, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Montana Hits Remixed. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. iMatthew (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Protection Program[edit]

There is a clear consensus to delete this article until the release of the film. Please don't recreate it until the issues raised in the deletion discussion have been addressed, or it will continue to be deleted. – iride scent 17:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of High School Musical Hits Remixed[edit]

The article High School Musical Hits Remixed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable recording.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of High School Musical Hits Remixed for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High School Musical Hits Remixed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High School Musical Hits Remixed (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ellen's Acres[edit]

The article Ellen's Acres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:GNG. Only citation is a database listing in a book confirming its existence, but no in depth coverage found elsewhere.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]