Jump to content

User talk:NYkid0709

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent edits to Xbox 360

[edit]

Please include an edit summary with your edits. Your recent edits to Xbox 360 have none. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 14:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. You have now reverted 4 times in a 24hr period, with no explanation for your edits: [1][2] [3] [4] - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit]

Regarding reversions[5] made on January 11 2007 to Xbox 360

[edit]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 14:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/NYkid0709 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

(Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 19:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Template:Windows Live

[edit]

Please include an edit summary with your edits. Your recent edits to Template:Windows Live have none. Pikablu0530 08:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Xbox 360

[edit]

You have been consistently replacing a lot of work that other editors have done on the Xbox 360 article. Your edits are all without an edit summary and seem to be the same reinsertion or removal of information done by anonymous IPs (before a semi-protect). I am imploring you to explain the changes you make to this article in the future. - (Nuggetboy) (talk) (contribs) 02:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Xbox 360. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --SUIT42 01:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Syrthiss 13:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Syrthiss 14:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 22:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Syrthiss 13:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your continued disruption to this page during your block by putting an entire version of the Xbox 360 article here, complete with fair-use images, I have protected this page. If you wish to request unblocking at some point to return productively, you may email the unblock-en-l mailing list. — TKD::Talk 05:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TKD::Talk 16:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]