User talk:Nagarindam

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nagarindam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article D-Mart, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. This is in respect of the promotional text which you added to the article. AllyD (talk) 12:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 11:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Ping

Your Ping message on Wikipedia:Emerald ("i need your immediate help in updating content for the company that i work for.... some how the information on the page is incorrect. Please help!") is off-topic there, so I am responding here. For topics on which you would have a conflict of interest, the correct approach is to describe the sought changes, along with suitable references for verification, on the Talk page of the article about the company. An uninvolved editor can then evaluate the prospective change. AllyD (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AllyD, have made the required changes (sorry for the ignorance) please kindly help review and suggest if any part of the text is still under the objectionable clause