User talk:NaomiSyken

IF Y0U ARE G0ING T0 KEEP CHANGING MY DAUGHTERS BI0 WITH INC0RRECT INF0RMATI0N I WILL KEEP 0N DELETING IT UNTIL Y0U FINALLY UNDERSTAND AND LEAVE THE CORRECT INFORMATION THAT I WRITE. WHAT YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT HER IS INCORRECT AND I WILL NOT ALLOW IT TO STAY UP FOR THE WHOLE WORLD TO READ. IF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS CONTACT ME- NAOMI SYKEN <e-mail address redacted>.

March 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jenna Syken, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Nabudis Shadow (talk) 02:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jenna Syken, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Kolindigo (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jenna Syken, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jenna Syken was changed by NaomiSyken (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-03-28T20:42:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jenna Syken constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 14:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC))[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jenna Syken, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jenna Syken was changed by NaomiSyken (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-01T19:28:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jenna Syken has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 20:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia

I regret to advise you that I have had to suspend your editing privileges for an indefinite period. You have been, after being requested not to, editing Jenna Syken in a disruptive manner. I note that you claim to have family connections to the subject, and have requested that editors respect your insistence on vetting the article - but that is not the appropriate process on Wikipedia. You are required to provide the encyclopedia with the evidence relating to the accuracy of the information provided by you against that provided by others.

There are various means by which you can properly address your concerns regarding articles relating to (suggested) family members. Please use the help feature found in the left hand column of your account editing page. You will need to contact Wikipedia:OFFICE to discuss addressing your concerns.

I would lastly note that indefinite does not mean infinite, but only as long (or short) a period as is required to stop disruption of the encyclopedia. Once it is determined that your concerns have merit and are being addressed, and you undertake not to disrupt Wikipedia, then your editing privileges can be restored. Thank you. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]